The collapse of
the Republican effort to repeal and replace Obama care has led to speculation
in many quarters that as a last resort Congress might give bipartisanship
another try. Many consider that wishful thinking if not hopelessly naive. But
Share Our Strength’s experience with it’s No Kid Hungry campaign suggests that
there are times when such bipartisanship can not only work but produce concrete
results that measurably improve lives.
Granted
that feeding hungry kids is more popular and less complicated than tackling
health care. But it’s still dependent on legislation, government funding, and
the commitment of state and local officials to executive efficiently and
effectively. For the past 10 years we
have won the support of Democrats and Republicans alike making arguments that
have bipartisan appeal:
-
That
childhood hunger is a solvable problem
-
That
children are the most vulnerable and least responsible for the situation they
are in
-
That
the return on investing in children pays dividends and saves taxpayers money in
the long run.
Most important
of all, we have resisted the temptation to attack those with whom we disagree.
And the battles we’ve fought have been for the purpose of feeding kids, not for
the purpose of strengthening our own political prospects.
As I said, that
can sound naïve in today’s political culture. But the results speak for
themselves: 3 million kids added to the school breakfast program, a majority of
eligible kids participating in school meals rather than a minority, and
childhood hunger at its lowest level in more than a decade.
It’s a sad
commentary that in the health care debate, bipartisanship is considered only as
a last resort. But at this point there is no other option. And as we’ve seen in the effort to achieve No
Kid Hungry, that can a be a good thing.