When New York put $17.9 million in the budget this week to enable 500
elementary schools to switch to breakfast in the classroom, it meant 340,000
more kids will start their day with the meal they need to succeed. That’s
worthy of celebration in its own right. But as they say on the late night
infomercials for knives and kitchen appliances: “Wait, there’s more!”
We’re learning that the impact of breakfast in the classroom is potentially
even more profound.
A panel at Virginia’s School Breakfast Summit this month cast our school
breakfast work in a new light. The four testimonials from a principal,
superintendent, literacy specialist and school nutrition director went beyond
the usual rhetoric that “hungry kids can’t learn.” Instead each made a related
but different point about the value of alternative breakfast strategies.
They explained how breakfast after the bell increases
instructional time in measurable ways.
Many kids
previously came to class late most days because they would go to the cafeteria
first – not early before school, but as the first period was starting – and
then arrive at first period halfway through. Alternative breakfast gave
the teachers 20 minutes back and a full first period.
Increased
instruction time is the coin of the realm in education circles. It is one of
the most important variables in increasing the academic achievement upon which
school rankings, teacher performance, and funding often ride. Accordingly
legions of advocates advance and champion ideas for squeezing more class time
into a finite school day.
Now apply this
to our win in New York. Imagine a percentage of the 340,000 elementary school
students who will start getting breakfast in the classroom having 15 more
minutes of instructional time a day. Over the course of 180 school days
that would yield 45 hours of additional instruction. More than an entire
week. It is a “school breakfast dividend” that compensates for the class
time that we’ve been stealing from children and teachers through the less inefficient
cafeteria model instituted half a century ago. Any calculation about
return on investment for breakfast after the bell ought to include it.
There are
obvious physical and developmental benefits to ensuring that children start
their day well fed and ready to learn. There is also the value of eating
together as a class, in a more communal setting, rather than in cliques in the
cafeteria. Now add additional instructional time that benefits students and
teachers alike. There not a less expensive or more cost effective way to
achieve it than the innovation moving breakfast to when and where kids are,
rather than requiring the kids to navigate logistical hurdles, often beyond
their control, of getting to breakfast.
There’s more to
celebrate than we thought.